Eggermont · Handbook of clinical neurology 2019 · narrative review · n=?

Cochlea and auditory nerve.

Cited 16 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review of auditory physiology and diagnostic electrophysiology without original empirical data or systematic search methodology.

PubMed 31277867 · doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00029-1 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This narrative review outlines the physiological mechanisms of cochlear and auditory nerve transduction and details clinical electrophysiological and acoustic tests, including electrocochleography (cochlear microphonic, summating potential, compound action potentials), otoacoustic emissions, narrow-band action potentials, and efferent olivocochlear bundle testing via contralateral suppression.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical data, diagnostic accuracy metrics, or statistical comparisons. It qualitatively reports that preserved cochlear microphonics alongside absent compound action potentials indicate auditory neuropathy; summating potentials are frequently increased and prolonged in Ménière's disease but overlap with normal ranges; narrow-band action potentials aid in distinguishing Ménière's disease from vestibular schwannomas; and contralateral acoustic stimulation tests efferent olivocochlear bundle patency by suppressing otoacoustic emission amplitude.

Why it matters

It summarizes how combinations of cochlear electrophysiological tests can help differentiate between sensory and retrocochlear pathologies presenting with overlapping symptoms like hearing loss, tinnitus, and dizziness.

Limits

The abstract provides no primary data, sample sizes, or quantitative test performance metrics (such as sensitivity, specificity, or likelihood ratios). As a narrative review, it lacks a systematic search and appraisal methodology.

Cited by