De Souza · Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 2019 · narrative review · n=?

The Role of Energy Availability in Reproductive Function in the Female Athlete Triad and Extension of its Effects to Men: An Initial Working Model of a Similar Syndrome in Male Athletes.

Cited 113 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and conceptual working model without original empirical data or systematic review methodology

PubMed 31696452 · doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01217-3 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The authors conducted a narrative review of the Female Athlete Triad literature regarding low energy availability, reproductive function, and bone health. Using existing evidence, they developed an initial working model of a comparable syndrome in male athletes (the Male Athlete Triad), focusing on physiological responses of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis and bone health to energetic deficiency across sexes.

What was found

The review reported qualitative findings without quantitative meta-analytic data: (1) available evidence does not support a distinct energy availability cutoff below which menstrual dysfunction is triggered; (2) male reproductive, energetic, and skeletal systems appear more resilient to low energy availability than female systems, requiring more severe energy deficits before impairments occur; and (3) hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis recovery appears faster in men than in women after low energy availability.

Why it matters

This review establishes a theoretical framework for recognizing and researching energy-deficiency syndromes in male athletes while challenging previous assumptions of a single, universal energy-availability threshold for reproductive impairment in females.

Limits

The abstract provides no quantitative effect sizes, sample sizes, or study counts. As a narrative review rather than a systematic review, it is prone to selection bias, and the proposed male athlete triad model represents an early working framework rather than a validated clinical diagnostic paradigm.

Cited by