Charoenngam · Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma 2019 · narrative review · n=?

Vitamin D for skeletal and non-skeletal health: What we should know.

Cited 303 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and expert summary without systematic search or meta-analysis

PubMed 31708633 · doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2019.07.004 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

This is a narrative review summarizing vitamin D physiology, metabolism, clinical guidelines, and epidemiological associations. The authors synthesize diagnostic criteria defined by the Endocrine Society and review observational evidence regarding skeletal and non-skeletal health outcomes without systematic search methodology.

What was found

The abstract reports diagnostic thresholds for serum 25(OH)D: deficiency (<20 ng/mL), insufficiency (21–29 ng/mL), and sufficiency (30–100 ng/mL). It cites an estimated global prevalence of 1 billion people with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. Observational studies are referenced linking serum levels between 40–60 ng/mL to lower mortality and reduced risk of chronic diseases. No primary comparative data, effect sizes, or confidence intervals are reported.

Why it matters

It provides a broad overview of vitamin D biology for clinical practice, emphasizes targeted screening in high-risk populations (such as patients with osteoporosis or fall history), and notes the risk of underestimation when laboratory assays measure only 25(OH)D3 rather than total 25(OH)D.

Limits

As a narrative review, it lacks systematic search criteria, quality appraisal, or meta-analytic pooling. Assertions regarding chronic disease prevention and mortality rely on observational correlations subject to confounding, with no trial data presented to establish causality.

Cited by