Brandhorst · Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) 2019 · narrative review · n=?

Protein Quantity and Source, Fasting-Mimicking Diets, and Longevity.

Cited 95 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review of animal studies and preliminary human clinical trials without systematic review or meta-analysis.

PubMed 31728501 · doi:10.1093/advances/nmz079 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This narrative review summarizes literature regarding the effects of protein restriction, amino acid restriction, and periodic low-protein, low-calorie fasting-mimicking diets (FMDs) on healthspan and longevity. The authors synthesize findings across model organisms (including rodents) and human clinical trials, focusing on biomarkers of aging, stem cell-based regeneration, and sex-specific responses to dietary interventions.

What was found

The abstract reports no quantitative results, effect sizes, or statistical metrics. It qualitatively reports that protein and amino acid restriction reduce aging-related comorbidities and that periodic FMDs combined with post-cycle refeeding may stimulate stem cell-based regeneration while avoiding the compliance issues and adverse effects (such as impaired wound healing or immune suppression) linked to chronic dietary restriction.

Why it matters

Chronic severe calorie or protein restriction is difficult for humans to maintain and carries safety risks; periodic fasting-mimicking protocols offer a potential translational framework to harness similar longevity pathways with improved compliance.

Limits

The abstract provides no quantitative data. As a narrative review, it is subject to selection bias. Most cited mechanisms rely on non-human model organisms, with the authors noting that data in primates and humans remain limited.

Cited by