Gibson · PLoS genetics 2019 · meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies · n=13,493

A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of epigenetic age acceleration.

Cited 150 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Meta-analysis of cross-sectional and cohort observational genetic association data (by design analogy, non-interventional).

PubMed 31738745 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1008104 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

The authors conducted a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) evaluating two DNA methylation measures of epigenetic age acceleration—Horvath-based (Horvath-EAA) and Hannum-based (Hannum-EAA)—in 13,493 unrelated individuals of European ancestry. They identified associated SNPs, mapped implicated genes, and evaluated genetic correlations with parental longevity proxy metrics and lifestyle factors.

What was found

Ten independent SNPs were associated with Horvath-EAA (five novel), implicating 21 genes involved in metabolism (NHLRC, TPMT) and immune pathways (TRIM59, EDARADD). GWAS of Hannum-EAA identified one associated variant (rs1005277), implicating 12 genes involved in innate immunity (UBE2D3, MANBA, TRIM46), metabolism (UBE2D3, MANBA), and lifespan regulation (CISD2). Both clocks had nominal inverse genetic correlations with father's age at death. Hannum-EAA demonstrated nominally significant genetic correlations with lifestyle factors (smoking behaviors, education), whereas Horvath-EAA did not. Specific numerical effect sizes and p-values were not provided in the abstract.

Why it matters

This study maps novel genetic determinants of biological aging rates and demonstrates that Horvath and Hannum epigenetic clocks capture distinct biological and environmental aging processes.

Limits

The study was restricted entirely to individuals of European ancestry, limiting generalizability to other populations. Specific effect sizes, test statistics, and exact significance thresholds were not reported in the abstract. Statistical genetic associations do not demonstrate direct mechanistic causality.

Cited by