Sá · Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 2020 · narrative review · n=?

Food processing for the improvement of plant proteins digestibility.

Cited 437 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review of food processing methods without systematic review methodology or new human data.

PubMed 31760758 · doi:10.1080/10408398.2019.1688249 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

This review examined the effects of various food processing methods—such as cooking, autoclaving, germination, microwaving, irradiation, spray-drying, freeze-drying, fermentation, extrusion, and emerging non-thermal technologies—on the inactivation of antinutritional factors (e.g., phytates, tannins, trypsin inhibitors, and lectins) and the digestibility of plant proteins.

What was found

The abstract provides no quantitative data or effect sizes. It qualitatively reports that cooking, autoclaving, germination, microwaving, irradiation, drying, fermentation, and extrusion enhanced plant protein quality, whereas the impact of emerging non-thermal technologies on protein digestibility requires further study.

Why it matters

Plant proteins typically have lower digestibility and bioavailability than animal proteins due to antinutritional factors; identifying processing techniques that reduce these factors is critical for improving plant-based protein alternatives.

Limits

The abstract contains no numerical metrics, search criteria, study counts, or specific experimental parameters. It does not differentiate between in vitro, animal, or human digestion models.

Cited by