Marini · Psychoneuroendocrinology 2020 · prospective longitudinal cohort study · n=973

Adversity exposure during sensitive periods predicts accelerated epigenetic aging in children.

Cited 145 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Prospective longitudinal cohort study

PubMed 31918390 · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.104484 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

Using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; n = 973), researchers prospectively evaluated the relationship between repeated measures of seven types of childhood adversity and epigenetic aging measured at age 7.5. Epigenetic age acceleration was estimated using both the Horvath and Hannum DNA methylation clocks. A Least Angle Regression variable selection procedure was applied to test for sensitive period effects relative to cumulative or recent exposure models.

What was found

Exposure to abuse, financial hardship, or neighborhood disadvantage during sensitive periods in early and middle childhood best explained Hannum-based epigenetic age acceleration, remaining significant after accounting for adversity accumulation and recency. Secondary sex-stratified analyses also identified sensitive period effects. These associations were missed when analyzing adversity as a binary (exposed vs unexposed) measure. No associations were identified using the Horvath epigenetic clock. The abstract reports no numerical effect sizes, test statistics, or p-values.

Why it matters

This study provides prospective evidence that the developmental timing of adversity influences biological aging markers in children, while showing that different epigenetic clocks capture distinct biological signatures of stress.

Limits

The abstract reports no numerical values, effect sizes, confidence intervals, or p-values. Findings were discordant across measurement tools, appearing only with the Hannum clock and not the Horvath clock. As an observational cohort study, residual confounding cannot be ruled out. Epigenetic age was assessed at only a single time point (age 7.5).

Cited by