Nieddu · Nutrients 2020 · Cross-sectional comparative study · n=210

Dietary Habits, Anthropometric Features and Daily Performance in Two Independent Long-Lived Populations from Nicoya peninsula (Costa Rica) and Ogliastra (Sardinia).

Cited 53 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional observational study

PubMed 32492804 · doi:10.3390/nu12061621 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Cross-sectional study comparing dietary intake, body measurements, and functional performance in 210 oldest-old individuals from two Longevity Blue Zones: Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica (n = 60, aged 80–109 years, 31 male) and mountainous Ogliastra, Sardinia, Italy (n = 150, aged 90–101 years, 61 male). Researchers collected data using validated food frequency questionnaires, Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), body mass index, and waist and limb circumferences.

What was found

Both cohorts consumed plant-derived foods most frequently: cereals were eaten daily by 60–80% of participants, and legumes were eaten daily by ≥80% in Nicoya and 2–5 servings per week by ≥60% in Ogliastra. Animal-source foods (meat, dairy) were consumed daily by ≥60% of participants in Nicoya and ≥80% in Ogliastra. Frequency of milk consumption correlated positively with BADL scores (rho = 0.268 in Nicoya, rho = 0.214 in Ogliastra) and IADL scores (rho = 0.466 in Nicoya, rho = 0.471 in Ogliastra). Legume consumption correlated negatively with self-rated health (rho = -0.264) and IADL scores (rho = -0.332).

Why it matters

Provides empirical dietary and functional intake data directly from two distinct long-lived geographic populations, showing that their diets are primarily plant-based but feature regular dairy and meat intake.

Limits

The cross-sectional design cannot establish causality or determine if current late-life diets reflect lifelong habits. Total sample size was modest (particularly the Nicoya cohort, n = 60). Dietary intake relied on self-report questionnaires subject to recall bias, and potential confounding variables such as socioeconomic status or overall caloric intake were not reported.

Cited by