Ho · Research in sports medicine (Print) 2020 · randomized crossover trial · n=25

Effects of knee flexion angles in supine bridge exercise on trunk and pelvic muscle activity.

Cited 20 times in the scientific literature.

Level 2 - randomized trial

Randomized crossover physiological trial

PubMed 32567954 · doi:10.1080/15438627.2020.1777552 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Twenty-five physically active males performed maximum voluntary isometric contraction tests followed by supine bridge exercises at four randomized knee flexion angles (40°, 60°, 90°, and 120°). Surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded on the dominant side for the rectus abdominis, erector spinae, gluteus medius, superior gluteus maximus, inferior gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris long head. Muscle activation ratios (superior gluteus maximus/biceps femoris and inferior gluteus maximus/biceps femoris) were calculated and compared using magnitude-based inference.

What was found

Muscle activation patterns varied significantly across knee angles, with the largest differences observed between 40° and 120°: - Erector spinae and biceps femoris activation decreased as knee flexion angle increased (40° > 60° > 90° > 120°), showing a moderate effect (-0.70 ± 0.17) for erector spinae and an extremely large effect (-4.78 ± 0.51) for biceps femoris when comparing 120° to 40°. - Superior and inferior gluteus maximus activation favored larger knee flexion angles (90° = 120° > 60° > 40°). - Ratios of gluteus to hamstring activity increased markedly at 120° versus 40°, with effect sizes of 2.68 ± 0.23 for superior gluteus maximus/biceps femoris and 2.95 ± 0.26 for inferior gluteus maximus/biceps femoris.

Why it matters

Performing supine bridges at 90° or 120° of knee flexion optimizes gluteus maximus recruitment while minimizing hamstring and erector spinae dominance, offering practical positioning guidance for rehabilitation and strength protocols.

Limits

The study was small (n = 25) and included only healthy, active young males, limiting generalizability to females, clinical rehabilitation cohorts, or older adults. Surface electromyography measures muscle electrical activation rather than direct force output, and long-term training adaptations were not assessed.

Cited by