Colich · Psychological bulletin 2020 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=79 studies (54 meta-analyzed, n = 116,010; 25 systematically reviewed, n = 3,253)

Biological aging in childhood and adolescence following experiences of threat and deprivation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cited 431 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (graded by design analogy)

PubMed 32744840 · doi:10.1037/bul0000270 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Meta-analysis of 54 studies (n = 116,010) testing associations of early life adversity (ELA) with pubertal timing and cellular aging (telomere length and DNA methylation age), alongside a systematic review of 25 studies (n = 3,253) examining neural markers (cortical thickness and amygdala-prefrontal cortex functional connectivity), stratified by adversity type (threat vs. deprivation and low socioeconomic status [SES]).

What was found

Overall ELA was associated with accelerated pubertal timing (d = -0.10) and cellular aging (d = -0.21). Moderator analyses showed: - Threat-related ELA was associated with accelerated pubertal development (d = -0.26) and cellular aging (d = -0.43). - Deprivation and low SES were unrelated to accelerated pubertal or cellular development. - ELA was associated with accelerated cortical thinning, with threat linked to ventromedial prefrontal cortex thinning, and deprivation/SES linked to frontoparietal, default, and visual networks. - No consistent association was found between ELA and amygdala-prefrontal cortex connectivity.

Why it matters

It demonstrates specificity in biological aging pathways, indicating that threat exposures drive cellular and pubertal acceleration whereas deprivation impacts distinct neural networks rather than systemic biological aging.

Limits

Primary studies are observational, precluding direct causal conclusions. Neural markers were systematically reviewed rather than meta-analyzed quantitatively, and exact confidence intervals or heterogeneity metrics are not reported in the abstract.

Cited by