DuBroff · BMJ evidence-based medicine 2021 · systematic review of randomized controlled trials · n=35 studies

Hit or miss: the new cholesterol targets.

Cited 15 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 32747335 · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111413 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

The authors conducted a systematic review of 35 randomized controlled trials evaluating drug treatment to achieve recommended cholesterol targets across four moderate- to high-risk patient populations: patients with prior cardiovascular events, adults with diabetes, individuals with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥190 mg/dL, and individuals with an estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk ≥7.5%.

What was found

Achieving recommended cholesterol target levels did not confer additional benefit across the 35 randomized controlled trials. No specific numerical risk estimates, relative risks, or confidence intervals were reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

The findings challenge guideline-recommended LDL-C targets and cardiovascular risk calculation thresholds, questioning the use of LDL-C as a surrogate target for cardiovascular prevention.

Limits

The abstract provides no numerical data, effect sizes, or confidence intervals, and omits details regarding specific drug classes, trial endpoints, follow-up durations, or heterogeneity across the 35 trials.

Cited by