Zhou · Journal of aerosol science 2021 · Cross-sectional observational study · n=14 patients (10 with COVID-19), 318 surface swabs, 44 air samples

Breath-, air- and surface-borne SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals.

Cited 122 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional observational sampling study of patients and hospital environments

PubMed 33078030 · doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105693 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

Researchers collected exhaled breath condensate, environmental air samples, and surface swabs across four hospitals in Wuhan with natural ventilation and regular disinfection. The study evaluated 14 participants (including 10 COVID-19 patients) using RT-PCR and digital PCR to assess SARS-CoV-2 contamination and evaluate patients meeting standard throat-swab discharge criteria.

What was found

Among COVID-19 patients ready for discharge based on standard protocols, 22.2% (n = 9) had detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in their exhaled breath (~10^5 RNA copies/m^3, estimated at ~1400 RNA copies/min). Surface swabs were positive in 3.1% (n = 318), showing contamination on healthcare worker face shields and work shift floors (3–8 viruses/cm^2). Air samples were positive in 6.8% (3 of 44, concentration 9–219 viruses/m^3) under natural ventilation conditions (1.6–3.3 m/s).

Why it matters

Standard throat-swab testing protocols may miss patients who continue shedding viral RNA into the air via respiration. Testing exhaled breath condensate could provide an additional safeguard prior to hospital discharge.

Limits

The human sample size was extremely small (10 COVID-19 subjects, 9 evaluated at discharge). PCR detects RNA presence rather than viable infectious virus, and clinical transmission outcomes following discharge were not evaluated.

Cited by