Doma · International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition 2022 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=353

Selected root plant supplementation reduces indices of exercise-induced muscle damage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cited 12 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 parallel and crossover trials

PubMed 33196371 · doi:10.1024/0300-9831/a000689 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of root plant supplementation (curcumin, ginseng, ginger, and garlic) on biomarkers of muscle damage and functional muscular performance after muscle-damaging exercise protocols. Authors analyzed 25 parallel and crossover studies comprising 353 participants, assessed study quality using the PEDro scale, and meta-analyzed standardized mean differences (SMD) at 24 and 48 hours post-exercise.

What was found

Supplementation significantly reduced indirect muscle damage markers (creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and myoglobin) and muscle soreness compared to placebo at both 24 hours and 48 hours (p < 0.01 for both time points). Inflammatory markers were significantly lower with supplementation at 24 hours (p = 0.02), but not at 48 hours (p = 0.40). Muscular performance measures did not differ significantly between groups at 24 or 48 hours (p > 0.05). Qualitative synthesis of oxidative stress and antioxidant markers showed mixed findings.

Why it matters

These findings suggest that while root extracts reduce circulating damage markers and soreness after strenuous exercise, they do not accelerate functional muscular recovery.

Limits

The total sample size was small across 25 studies (353 total participants). The review pooled disparate botanical interventions (curcumin, ginseng, ginger, garlic) with varying dosages and exercise protocols. The abstract reports p-values but lacks effect size estimates and confidence intervals.

Cited by