Ishida · The Journal of nutritional biochemistry 2021 · Preclinical in vitro and animal experimental study · n=?

Sulforaphane ameliorates ethanol plus carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis in mice through the Nrf2-mediated antioxidant response and acetaldehyde metabolization with inhibition of the LPS/TLR4 signaling pathway.

Cited 88 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Preclinical in vitro and animal laboratory research without human clinical data.

PubMed 33388347 · doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2020.108573 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

Researchers evaluated the protective effects of sulforaphane against alcoholic liver disease-related fibrosis using human hepatoma cells (HepaRG), human hepatic stellate cells (LX-2), and a mouse model of liver fibrosis induced by ethanol plus carbon tetrachloride (EtOH/CCl4). They examined acetaldehyde metabolism, Nrf2-driven antioxidant gene expression (HMOX1, NQO1, GSTM3), fibrogenic activity, Kupffer cell infiltration, and the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling pathway.

What was found

The abstract reports directional findings without specific numerical values or effect sizes. In HepaRG cells, sulforaphane increased mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase activity. In LX-2 cells, it suppressed acetaldehyde-induced proliferation, profibrogenic activity, and LPS/TLR4-mediated sensitization to TGF-β, while downregulating NOX1 and NOX4 and upregulating antioxidant genes. In EtOH/CCl4 mice, oral sulforaphane enhanced hepatic acetaldehyde clearance, decreased hepatic fat accumulation and lipid peroxidation, inhibited Kupffer cell infiltration and fibrosis, reduced gut-derived LPS exposure, and suppressed TLR4 signaling.

Why it matters

This study outlines molecular mechanisms by which sulforaphane might mitigate alcoholic liver injury, targeting both antioxidant defense (Nrf2) and inflammatory/fibrotic signaling (LPS/TLR4). It provides preclinical rationale for investigating sulforaphane derivatives or dietary interventions in liver fibrosis.

Limits

The study is entirely preclinical, relying on immortalized cell lines and a chemically accelerated mouse model (EtOH/CCl4) that may not fully reflect human alcoholic liver disease pathology. The abstract provides no sample sizes, dosages, or quantitative statistical data. Human clinical trials are needed to assess efficacy, bioavailability, and safety.

Cited by