Grgic · Journal of sport and health science 2022 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=15 studies

Effects of resistance training performed to repetition failure or non-failure on muscular strength and hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cited 208 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention trials

PubMed 33497853 · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2021.01.007 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effects of resistance training to repetition failure versus non-failure on muscular strength and muscle hypertrophy. Subgroup meta-analyses assessed potential moderators: training status (trained vs. untrained), volume equation (equated vs. non-equated), body region (upper vs. lower), exercise selection (multi- vs. single-joint for strength), and study design (independent vs. dependent groups).

What was found

Fifteen studies were analyzed, all in young adults. Overall meta-analysis showed no significant difference between failure and non-failure for muscular strength (ES = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.05) or hypertrophy (ES = 0.22, 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.55). Subgroup analyses by body region, exercise selection, or study design showed no significant differences. When training volume was not equated, non-failure significantly favored strength gains (ES = -0.32, 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.07). In resistance-trained individuals, training to failure showed a significant positive effect for muscle hypertrophy (ES = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.26).

Why it matters

This review demonstrates that lifting to failure is not necessary for maximizing strength or size, allowing trainees to avoid unnecessary fatigue unless pursuing marginal hypertrophy gains in trained states.

Limits

All included studies were limited to young adults, leaving older adults and highly trained or elite athletes unrepresented. Total subject count, specific exercise loads, proximity to failure in non-failure groups, and long-term adherence effects were not detailed in the abstract.

Cited by