Murphy · Age and ageing 2021 · narrative review · n=?

Recent mortality in Britain: a review of trends and explanations.

Cited 18 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review without systematic methodology

PubMed 33625483 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afab016 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

This paper is a narrative review examining trends in British standardised mortality rates and life expectancy from 2011 to 2019 compared to historical data since 1841, European Union countries, and the United States. The author assessed mortality across age, sex, socioeconomic groups, and seasons, and evaluated proposed explanations including post-2008 government austerity policies, seasonal influenza, cardiovascular mortality, and dementia diagnostic coding shifts.

What was found

The annual percentage improvement in British standardised mortality rates between 2011 and 2019 was the lowest for 70 years, following 2001–2010 which saw the highest improvements since records began in 1841. A similar, less severe slowdown occurred in most EU countries around 2011, and US life expectancy fell for three consecutive years (2014–2017). The British downturn affected all ages, sexes, and socioeconomic groups similarly. Volatility in year-to-year mortality increased from 2011 due to winter excess deaths, though underlying improvement slowed across all seasons. Mortality improved toward the end of the decade, with 2019 being the lowest recorded value in Britain. Evidence for a dominant role for austerity or seasonal influenza was judged weak. Cardiovascular trends primarily drove long-term overall mortality. The proportion of life spent in good health for both sexes over age 65 increased slightly since 2010.

Why it matters

It contextualizes the post-2011 stagnation in British life expectancy gains as part of a wider international trend across all demographic groups, cautioning against attributing the slowdown solely to austerity or winter influenza.

Limits

The abstract describes a narrative review rather than a systematic review or empirical statistical model, without reported study numbers or effect sizes. Changes in dementia coding and healthy life expectancy methodologies limit firm causal conclusions.

Cited by