Wang · Clinical endocrinology 2022 · systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies · n=17 studies (2,756 patients)

Association of vitamin D deficiency with COVID-19 infection severity: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cited 111 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

PubMed 34160843 · doi:10.1111/cen.14540 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Databases were searched from 1 January 2019 to 3 December 2020 for observational studies assessing the link between vitamin D deficiency and COVID-19 infection severity. Independent reviewers extracted data across 17 observational studies comprising 2,756 patients. Outcomes examined were mortality, hospital admission, intensive care unit admission, and length of hospital stay.

What was found

Compared to non-deficient status, vitamin D deficiency was associated with: - Increased mortality: OR 2.47 (95% CI: 1.50–4.05; 12 studies) and HR 4.11 (95% CI: 2.40–7.04; 3 studies). - Higher rates of hospital admission: OR 2.18 (95% CI: 1.48–3.21; 3 studies). - Longer hospital stays: difference of 0.52 days (95% CI: 0.25–0.80; 2 studies). Subgroup analyses by deficiency cut-offs, latitude, and geographic location showed consistent trends.

Why it matters

This review pools early pandemic observational data showing a consistent association between low vitamin D levels and severe COVID-19 outcomes, highlighting the need for interventional trials to evaluate whether supplementation improves clinical outcomes.

Limits

All included data derive from observational studies, precluding causal inference due to confounding factors like age, obesity, socioeconomic status, and reverse causation (acute phase drop in 25-hydroxyvitamin D). Studies varied in definitions and thresholds for deficiency, and interventional supplementation was not assessed.

Cited by