Junker · PloS one 2021 · cross-sectional study · n=1,378

The prevalence and correlates of pre-diabetes in middle- to older-aged Irish adults using three diagnostic methods.

Cited 13 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional epidemiological analysis of a primary care cohort

PubMed 34170932 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253537 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A cross-sectional follow-up study (Mitchelstown Cohort Rescreen, 2016/17) evaluated 1,378 middle- to older-aged adults recruited from a single primary care center in Ireland. Pre-diabetes was defined using three criteria: ADA HbA1c (5.7%–6.4%), WHO-IEC HbA1c (6.0%–6.4%), and ADA fasting plasma glucose (FPG; 5.6–6.9 mmol/l). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify correlates.

What was found

Pre-diabetes prevalence was 43.9% (95% CI: 41.2%–46.5%) by ADA HbA1c, 14.5% (95% CI: 12.7%–16.5%) by WHO-IEC HbA1c, and 15.8% (95% CI: 13.9%–17.8%) by ADA FPG. Univariate associations included sex, age, marital status, health rating, education, and poor diet quality. In multivariable analysis, subjects identified by ADA FPG had the least favorable metabolic profiles, correlating with overweight/obesity (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 1.53–5.43), hypertension (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.51–3.40), and low HDL cholesterol (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.07–2.87).

Why it matters

Diagnostic definitions cause a threefold variation in pre-diabetes prevalence estimates, significantly impacting screening benchmarks and resource planning for national prevention programs.

Limits

The sample was derived from a single primary care center, limiting broader generalizability. The cross-sectional design cannot determine progression rates to type 2 diabetes or long-term clinical outcomes.

Cited by