Zhang · Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) 2021 · narrative review · n=?

Phthalate metabolites: Characterization, toxicities, global distribution, and exposure assessment.

Cited 320 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review of pharmacokinetic, mechanistic, and biomonitoring literature without systematic review methodology.

PubMed 34520948 · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118106 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

The authors reviewed published literature on phthalate metabolites (mPAEs) to characterize their pharmacokinetics in animal and human models, evaluate molecular and cellular mechanisms of toxicity, summarize global human biomonitoring levels across multiple biological matrices (urine, blood, seminal fluid, breast milk, and amniotic fluid), and evaluate exposure assessment models.

What was found

Urine was identified as the preferred biological matrix for biomonitoring. Among 10 urinary mPAEs examined across regions, the largest proportions were di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) metabolites in Asia (40%), monoethyl phthalate (mEP) in America (43%), and an equal proportion of DEHP metabolites and mEP in Europe (29% each). Mono-5-carboxy-2-ethylpentyl phthalate was the most abundant DEHP metabolite. Toxic mechanisms showed subtle differences between mPAEs and parent phthalates due to chemical structure alterations.

Why it matters

Measuring urinary metabolites rather than parent compounds provides a more reliable metric for human exposure assessment and daily intake calculations, revealing distinct geographical exposure patterns across Asia, America, and Europe.

Limits

The abstract does not state the number of studies reviewed, the search strategy, or date ranges. Toxicological and pharmacokinetic conclusions rely partly on animal models, and precise daily intake calculations remain constrained by uncertainty in population-specific urinary excretion fractions (F_UE).

Cited by