Kolacz · Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies 2022 · observational laboratory study · n=94

Associations between acoustic features of maternal speech and infants' emotion regulation following a social stressor.

Cited 17 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional observational laboratory study (by design analogy, non-clinical developmental science)

PubMed 34618391 · doi:10.1111/infa.12440 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

Researchers assessed 94 mother-infant dyads (infant age 4–8 months) following the Still-Face paradigm social stressor. Infant physiological responses (heart rate and respiratory sinus arrhythmia/cardiac vagal tone) were derived from electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings, and behavioral distress was coded from negative vocalizations, facial expressions, and gaze aversion. Maternal vocalizations were analyzed using spectral analysis and spectro-temporal modulation via two-dimensional fast Fourier transformation of audio spectrograms to create a maternal prosody composite score.

What was found

High values on the maternal prosody composite were associated with: - Decreases in infant heart rate (β = -.26, 95% CI: [-0.46, -0.05]) - Decreases in infant behavioral distress (β = -.23, 95% CI: [-0.42, -0.03]) - Increases in cardiac vagal tone among infants with low vagal tone during the stressor (1 SD below mean β = .39, 95% CI: [0.06, 0.73]) Additionally, high infant heart rate predicted increases in the maternal prosody composite (β = .18, 95% CI: [0.03, 0.33]).

Why it matters

The findings identify specific acoustic properties of maternal infant-directed speech that predict physiological and behavioral calming in stressed infants, providing quantitative evidence for bidirectional biobehavioral co-regulation.

Limits

The study is an observational laboratory cohort design, which cannot establish causality. The sample size was modest (94 dyads) and restricted to biological mothers and 4–8-month-old infants, with no data on non-maternal caregivers or long-term regulatory outcomes.

Cited by