Lei · Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 2021 · narrative review · n=?

Ergonomic Consideration in Pillow Height Determinants and Evaluation.

Cited 30 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review of biomechanical and ergonomic literature without systematic review protocol

PubMed 34683013 · doi:10.3390/healthcare9101333 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

The authors conducted a literature review of studies published since 1997 evaluating determinants and research methodologies for pillow height, focusing on the physiological and mechanical characteristics of the head-neck-shoulder complex during sleep.

What was found

No quantitative effect sizes or numerical ranges are reported in the abstract. The review identified four primary objective determinants for evaluating pillow height: cervical spine alignment, anthropometric body dimensions, contact pressure, and neck/shoulder muscle activity. Due to insufficient evidence in the literature, the authors found no established optimal ranges for pressure distribution, muscle activity, or cervical alignment, and no definitive pillow height recommendation for either supine or lateral sleeping positions.

Why it matters

This review categorizes the biomechanical factors relevant to head and neck support, pointing out that current research lacks the standardized data needed to define an ideal pillow height.

Limits

The abstract does not state the number of studies reviewed or use systematic review methodology. The underlying literature failed to provide adequate evidence to determine optimal numerical ranges or design standards for sleep posture ergonomics.

Cited by