Ravindrakumar · Chronobiology international 2022 · Systematic review of experimental studies · n=55 studies

Daily variation in performance measures related to anaerobic power and capacity: A systematic review.

Cited 29 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review of experimental crossover/repeated-measures studies

PubMed 34978950 · doi:10.1080/07420528.2021.1994585 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Authors searched PubMed, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science through May 2021 for experimental studies in adult males (aged ≥ 18 years) assessing anaerobic power or capacity between at least two time points in a day (morning vs. evening). A total of 55 studies were included (39 assessing anaerobic power, 25 assessing anaerobic capacity).

What was found

Forty-eight of 55 studies reported significantly higher performance variables in the evening than the morning, whereas 7 studies found no significant time-of-day differences. Diurnal differences favoring the evening varied by test modality: jump tests (2.7% to 12.3%), force-velocity tests (~8%), sprint tests (2.7% to 11.3%), 5-m multiple shuttle run tests (3.7% to 13.1%), Wingate tests (1.8% to 11.7%), and repeated sprint tests (3.4% to 10.2%). The running-based anaerobic sprint test (RAST) was the only test showing no diurnal variation.

Why it matters

Anaerobic power and capacity systematically peak in the evening in adult males across varied testing modalities. This demonstrates that testing schedules and athletic performance evaluations must rigorously control for time of day.

Limits

The review was restricted to adult males, precluding generalization to females or adolescents. The primary studies lacked standardized protocols and largely failed to control for chronotype, sleep, motivation, or habitual training times; no quantitative meta-analysis was performed.

Cited by