Kostic · Archives of sexual behavior 2022 · cross-sectional survey · n=3298

Sex and Sexual Orientation Differences in Sexuality and Mate Choice Criteria.

Cited 11 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Cross-sectional survey study graded by design analogy

PubMed 35590034 · doi:10.1007/s10508-021-02280-6 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

A cross-sectional survey evaluated mate choice criteria across sex and sexual orientation groups. A total of 3,298 participants completed self-report questionnaires: 1,863 males (1,675 gynephiles, 56 androphiles, 132 bisexuals) and 1,435 females (1,037 androphiles, 33 gynephiles, 365 bisexuals). The survey assessed preferences across multiple domains: financial prospects, good looks, chastity, ambition/industriousness, youth/age, uncommitted sex, visual sexual stimuli, status, physical attractiveness, jealousy, and interest in short- versus long-term mating.

What was found

The abstract reports no specific numerical values, effect sizes, or p-values. It reports qualitative findings: standard sex differences between heterosexual men and women were replicated across all analyzed measures. In non-heterosexual subgroups, bisexual respondents diverged more from heterosexual respondents than homosexual respondents did, specifically regarding interest in uncommitted sex, the importance of chastity, and interest in short-term mating.

Why it matters

The findings demonstrate that mate preferences vary across sexual orientations and indicate that bisexual and homosexual individuals exhibit distinct preference profiles rather than functioning as a single uniform group.

Limits

The abstract provides no numerical data, effect sizes, or confidence intervals. Subgroup sample sizes for non-heterosexual populations were very small (e.g., 33 female gynephiles and 56 male androphiles) compared to the heterosexual cohorts. The findings rely entirely on self-report cross-sectional survey data.

Cited by