Schleifenbaum · Hormones and behavior 2022 · prospective dyadic diary study · n=384 couples

Men are not aware of and do not respond to their female partner's fertility status: Evidence from a dyadic diary study of 384 couples.

Cited 14 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Prospective observational dyadic diary cohort study (by design analogy, non-clinical)

PubMed 35661968 · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105202 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A preregistered online dyadic diary study followed 384 heterosexual couples to evaluate whether men notice within-cycle fertility cues in female partners (measured via partner attractiveness, sexual desire, or desire for contact with others) and whether men exhibit mid-cycle increases in mate retention tactics (jealousy, attention, desire for partner contact, or sexual desire toward their partner).

What was found

The abstract reports no compelling evidence that men detect their partner's fertility status or that they show mid-cycle increases in mate retention tactics across the examined dimensions. The abstract provides no specific numerical values, effect sizes, or confidence intervals.

Why it matters

These findings challenge evolutionary psychology theories proposing that men have evolved psychological adaptations to detect female ovulatory status and selectively deploy mate retention behaviors during peak fertility.

Limits

The abstract does not specify how female cycle phases or ovulation were biologically verified (e.g., hormonal assays versus self-reported calendar tracking). Relying on daily subjective online self-reports introduces potential reporting bias, and the sample was restricted to heterosexual couples willing to complete intensive diary surveys.

Cited by