Li · Journal of internal medicine 2022 · narrative review · n=?

Epigenetic aging: Biological age prediction and informing a mechanistic theory of aging.

Cited 116 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review and expert opinion without systematic search or original data

PubMed 35726002 · doi:10.1111/joim.13533 · record verified 2026-08-31

What was done

Narrative review summarizing progress in DNA methylation-based epigenetic clocks, focusing on mechanistic links to aging physiology and clinical disease outcomes.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical findings or quantitative effect sizes. It qualitatively describes advances in epigenetic clocks predicting mortality, identifying specific methylation sites relevant to neurodegenerative disease and cancer, and tracking longitudinal associations with conditions like type 1 diabetes and psychotic experiences.

Why it matters

Highlights the necessity of shifting biological aging research from pure chronological age prediction to functional and mechanistic insights that can guide clinical practice.

Limits

As a narrative review, it lacks systematic search criteria, quality appraisal of included studies, and quantitative synthesis. No original empirical data are reported in the abstract.

Cited by