Fernandes · European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2022 · Systematic review and pathway analysis · n=51 studies (9,423 participants)

Charting the proteome landscape in major psychiatric disorders: From biomarkers to biological pathways towards drug discovery.

Cited 49 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Systematic review of non-randomized, observational case-control biomarker studies

PubMed 35763977 · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.06.001 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

The authors conducted a systematic review of published literature on peripheral blood proteomics in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Differentially expressed proteins were extracted and analyzed using pathway and network analyses to identify shared and disorder-specific biological pathways.

What was found

Across 51 studies involving 9,423 participants, 486 differentially expressed proteins were identified. Most biological pathways were common to all three disorders, predominantly involving immune system processes (interleukin, Toll-like receptor, and complement signaling) and signal transduction pathways (MAPK1/MAPK3, PI3K-Akt, Focal Adhesion-PI3K-Akt-mTOR, GPCR, and JAK-STAT). Other shared pathways included advanced glycosylation end-product receptor signaling, insulin-like growth factor regulation, cholesterol metabolism, and IL-17 signaling. Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder specifically shared integrin interactions, GRB2:SOS-MAPK linkage, and syndecan interactions, while bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder shared NRF2 and EGFR signaling pathways. No numerical effect sizes, fold-changes, or diagnostic accuracy metrics were reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

This review demonstrates that peripheral proteomic alterations across major psychiatric disorders heavily overlap in immune and intracellular signaling cascades, highlighting shared systemic biology rather than disease-specific blood biomarkers.

Limits

Peripheral blood markers may not reflect central nervous system pathology. The abstract lacks quantitative effect sizes, measures of statistical heterogeneity, and controls for crucial confounders such as medication exposure, disease stage, and assay platform variability.

Cited by