Diaz · The world journal of men's health 2023 · randomized controlled trial analysis · n=75

Comparison of Intratesticular Testosterone between Men Receiving Nasal, Intramuscular, and Subcutaneous Pellet Testosterone Therapy: Evaluation of Data from Two Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trials.

Cited 7 times in the scientific literature.

Level 2 - randomized trial

Comparative analysis of data from two randomized clinical trials

PubMed 35791295 · doi:10.5534/wjmh.210261 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

Data were analyzed from two ongoing single-center, open-label randomized clinical trials comparing three testosterone replacement formulations in 75 symptomatic hypogonadal men (serum testosterone <300 ng/dL, median age 45 years). Interventions included subcutaneous testosterone pellets (TP, 800 mg), intranasal testosterone (NT, 11 mg three times daily), or intramuscular testosterone cypionate (TC, 200 mg every 2 weeks). Serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP, evaluated as a surrogate for intratesticular testosterone) and total serum testosterone were measured at baseline and follow-up.

What was found

Baseline median serum testosterone was 223.5 ng/dL and baseline 17-OHP was 46. At 4-month follow-up, 17-OHP suppression was significantly lower in the NT group (-33.3% from baseline) compared to the TP group (-44%) and the TC group (-65.3%) (p=0.005). Serum testosterone increased across all groups (p=0.005): TC (+157.6%), NT (+114.3%), and TP (+79.6%).

Why it matters

Short-acting nasal testosterone appears to preserve the intratesticular testosterone surrogate 17-OHP better than long-acting formulations. This suggests nasal delivery may offer a fertility-sparing alternative for hypogonadal men desiring to maintain spermatogenesis while on testosterone therapy.

Limits

The total sample size was small (n=75) and combined data across two separate open-label trials rather than a single direct three-arm trial. Intratesticular testosterone was not measured directly, and clinical fertility endpoints (sperm counts, semen analysis, or pregnancy rates) were not evaluated.

Cited by