· Menopause (New York, N.Y.) 2022 · expert consensus statement · n=?

The 2022 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society.

Cited 885 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Expert consensus position statement and clinical practice guideline

PubMed 35797481 · doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000002028 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

An advisory panel of clinicians and researchers in women's health convened by The North American Menopause Society (NAMS) reviewed post-2017 literature, evaluated evidence quality, and reached consensus to update the 2017 NAMS hormone therapy position statement. Recommendations were subsequently reviewed and approved by the NAMS Board of Trustees.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical figures or effect sizes. Hormone therapy remains identified as the most effective therapy for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), while also preventing bone loss and fracture. The benefit-risk ratio is favorable for women aged younger than 60 years or within 10 years of menopause onset who lack contraindications. For women initiating therapy more than 10 years post-menopause or aged older than 60 years, the benefit-risk ratio becomes less favorable due to higher absolute risks of coronary heart disease, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and dementia. Low-dose vaginal estrogen, vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone, or oral ospemifene are recommended for isolated GSM symptoms not relieved by over-the-counter products.

Why it matters

This statement provides updated clinical guidance on individualizing menopausal hormone therapy by factoring in patient age, time since menopause onset, route of administration, and treatment indications.

Limits

The abstract reports no quantitative risk estimates, confidence intervals, or details on the literature search and grading methodology. As an expert consensus position statement, it synthesizes existing literature rather than presenting primary empirical trial data.

Cited by