Lin · The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners 2022 · prospective cohort study · n=177572

Association between vitamin D and incident herpes zoster: a UK Biobank study.

Cited 6 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Prospective cohort study with linked electronic health records

PubMed 35940884 · doi:10.3399/BJGP.2021.0623 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

A prospective cohort study evaluated 177,572 UK Biobank participants with at least one baseline serum vitamin D measurement and linked primary care or inpatient electronic health records. Baseline vitamin D was categorized as deficient (<25 nmol/L), insufficient (25–49 nmol/L), or sufficient (≥50 nmol/L); secondary exposures were self-reported supplementation and prescription records. Weibull regression models adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and immunosuppression to assess risk of incident herpes zoster over a mean follow-up of 10.1 years (SD 1.9).

What was found

Compared to participants with sufficient vitamin D levels, neither deficiency nor insufficiency was associated with incident herpes zoster: - Deficient: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.10) - Insufficient: aHR 1.03 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.10) No association with herpes zoster incidence was found for self-reported supplementation (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.16) or prescription records (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.34).

Why it matters

Despite hypotheses regarding vitamin D's immunomodulatory role, these population-scale data show no relationship between vitamin D levels or intake and shingles risk, providing no evidence to support vitamin D supplementation for herpes zoster prevention.

Limits

The observational design cannot exclude residual confounding. Vitamin D status was based on baseline measurement and may not capture long-term fluctuations. Outcome ascertainment depended on diagnostic coding in linked health records, which may miss milder cases, and the UK Biobank cohort is subject to healthy volunteer selection bias.

Cited by