Moore · Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 2022 · randomized crossover trial · n=12

Walking or body weight squat "activity snacks" increase dietary amino acid utilization for myofibrillar protein synthesis during prolonged sitting.

Cited 18 times in the scientific literature.

Level 2 - randomized trial

Individual randomized crossover trial in humans

PubMed 35952344 · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00106.2022 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

Twelve healthy young adults (7 males, 5 females; age ~23 years; BMI ~25.1 kg/m²; baseline ~7,300 steps/day) completed three 7.5-hour crossover trials: uninterrupted sitting (SIT), sitting with intermittent walking every 30 minutes (WALK), and sitting with intermittent bodyweight squats every 30 minutes (SQUAT). Participants consumed two mixed-macronutrient meals (~55% carbohydrate, 30% fat, 15% protein) enriched with stable isotope tracers (L-[ring-2H5]phenylalanine or L-[ring-13C6]phenylalanine). Vastus lateralis biopsies were collected to quantify myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) via tracer incorporation and anabolic signaling protein phosphorylation via immunoblotting.

What was found

Plasma phenylalanine enrichment time course and area under the curve did not differ across conditions (P ≥ 0.78). MyoPS was significantly higher in SQUAT (0.103 ± 0.030%/h) and WALK (0.118 ± 0.037%/h) compared with SIT (0.080 ± 0.032%/h; P < 0.05). Compared to SIT, effect sizes were 0.75 (95% CI: -0.10 to 1.55) for SQUAT and 1.10 (95% CI: 0.20 to 1.91) for WALK. Fold change in rpS6 Ser240/244 phosphorylation was significantly greater in SQUAT versus SIT (7.6 ± 2.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.45-fold, P < 0.05), with no significant differences observed between conditions for 4E-BP1, eEF2, mTOR, or ERK1/2 phosphorylation (P ≥ 0.21).

Why it matters

This study demonstrates that brief, low-barrier physical activity snacks during sedentary periods directly enhance the anabolic response of skeletal muscle to dietary protein. This provides a practical lifestyle strategy to stimulate muscle protein remodeling during prolonged daily sitting.

Limits

The study had a small sample size (n = 12) restricted to young, healthy individuals, limiting generalizability to older or metabolically impaired populations. The investigation assessed only acute 7.5-hour laboratory responses; long-term adaptations in muscle mass, strength, and chronic metabolic function were not evaluated.

Cited by