Mounsey · Globalization and health 2022 · qualitative policy landscape case study · n=18 key informants, 30 documents

Strengthening implementation of diet-related non-communicable disease prevention strategies in Fiji: a qualitative policy landscape analysis.

Cited 13 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Qualitative policy landscape case study using key informant interviews and document analysis (rated by design analogy, not clinical CEBM).

PubMed 36050736 · doi:10.1186/s12992-022-00859-9 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

A qualitative policy landscape case study examined the political context and alignment of diet-related non-communicable disease (NCD) prevention strategies in Fiji with World Health Organization recommendations. Data collection comprised: (1) semi-structured key informant interviews with policy stakeholders (n = 18), (2) documentary policy analysis using policy frameworks (n = 11), (3) documentary stakeholder analysis (n = 7), and (4) corporate political activity analysis of the food and beverage industry (n = 12). Data from government websites, internet searches, and in-country colleagues were analyzed thematically.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical metrics or statistical findings. The thematic analysis identified four primary areas to strengthen policy implementation: (1) enhancing multisectoral policy engagement, (2) embedding a nutrition- and health-in-all policy approach, (3) adopting a whole-of-society approach to unify cross-sector action, and (4) establishing institutional governance and clear accountability mechanisms with dedicated budgets to mitigate food industry influence.

Why it matters

Highlights governance and political-economy barriers to implementing evidence-based nutrition policies in a Pacific island nation experiencing high rates of cardiovascular disease and diabetes.

Limits

The study is descriptive and qualitative, limited to a single country's political context. The abstract does not measure health outcomes, policy enforcement rates, or objective dietary changes, and findings depend on key informant perspectives and available public documents.

Cited by