Li · Frontiers in molecular neuroscience 2022 · narrative review · n=?

A review of respirable fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 )-induced brain damage.

Cited 112 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review of mechanisms without systematic methodology or new human empirical data

PubMed 36157076 · doi:10.3389/fnmol.2022.967174 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

This narrative review summarizes literature regarding the pathophysiological mechanisms through which respirable fine particulate matter (PM2.5) induces brain injury, including cerebrovascular damage and neurological impairment, as well as pathways involved in post-injury brain self-repair.

What was found

The abstract reports no quantitative data or specific effect sizes. It describes qualitative pathways through which PM2.5 impacts the brain, including direct entry via the olfactory nerve, crossing the lung-gas-blood barrier, and mediating systemic oxidative stress and inflammation via the gut-microbiota-brain axis. It also notes the existence of a temporal window during which PM2.5-induced brain damage may repair itself.

Why it matters

Understanding the specific biological pathways linking airborne particulate exposure to cognitive decline, dementia, and stroke may highlight potential therapeutic windows and targets for mitigating pollution-related neurological damage.

Limits

The abstract provides no quantitative metrics, specific search criteria, study counts, or screening protocols typical of systematic reviews. It relies on generalized summaries of mechanistic pathways without detailing exposure thresholds, human versus animal model distinctions, or dose-response relationships.

Cited by