Liu · eLife 2022 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=7,382 participants across 43 studies

The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cited 22 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 36164828 · doi:10.7554/eLife.79002 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials searching nine databases (PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, CENTRAL, WHO Global Index Medicus, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, CNKI, and Wanfang Data) up to April 2021. The study evaluated the effects of calcium supplementation (via supplements or high-calcium diet) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) in people aged 35 years or younger.

What was found

Analysis of 43 randomized trials (7,382 participants) with moderate certainty of evidence showed calcium supplementation improved femoral neck BMD (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.627, 95% CI 0.338–0.915) and BMC (SMD 0.364, 95% CI 0.134–0.595), total body BMD (SMD 0.330, 95% CI 0.163–0.496) and BMC (SMD 0.149, 95% CI 0.006–0.291), and lumbar spine BMC (SMD 0.163, 95% CI 0.008–0.317). No significant effects were observed for lumbar spine BMD, total hip BMD, or total hip BMC. Femoral neck improvements were larger in adults aged 20–35 than in individuals under 20.

Why it matters

Targeting calcium intake during early adulthood (ages 20–35) enhances peak bone mass accretion, suggesting a potential preventative intervention window for reducing osteoporosis risk later in life.

Limits

Follow-up did not measure long-term clinical fracture outcomes in older age. Interventions mixed dietary calcium and supplements with variable dosages, and no significant improvement was observed for lumbar spine BMD or total hip parameters.

Cited by