Dorado · Respiratory care 2023 · multicenter prospective cohort study · n=326

Epidemiology of Weaning From Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Subjects With COVID-19.

Cited 14 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Multicenter prospective observational cohort study

PubMed 36379638 · doi:10.4187/respcare.09925 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted across 8 intensive care units (ICUs) to evaluate weaning characteristics in adult patients with COVID-19-induced acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 12 hours. Weaning categories and clinical outcomes were classified using the Weaning according to a New Definition (WIND) framework.

What was found

Among 326 included subjects, 52.1% never underwent a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). A total of 128 subjects were extubated, of whom 29.7% required re-intubation. Patients were classified into WIND groups: Group 0 (52.1%), Group 1 (28.5%), Group 2 (8.0%), and Group 3 (11.3%). Statistically significant differences across these groups were observed for duration of mechanical ventilation (P < .001) and ICU length of stay (P < .001).

Why it matters

This study provides prospective multicenter epidemiology on mechanical ventilation liberation in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure, showing that over half never attempted an SBT and nearly a third of extubated patients failed extubation.

Limits

The study is observational and lacks a non-COVID-19 control cohort. Specific reasons for withholding spontaneous breathing trials, causes of extubation failure, and long-term mortality data are not provided in the abstract.

Cited by