Liu · Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD 2023 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=16 studies

Association Between Oral Bacteria and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cited 59 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Systematic review of observational (case-control and cross-sectional) studies

PubMed 36404545 · doi:10.3233/JAD-220627 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

Authors conducted a systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis across six databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Library, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science) evaluating clinical studies on oral bacteria and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methodological quality was appraised, and evidence was synthesized qualitatively and quantitatively across 16 included studies (10 examining periodontal pathobionts and 6 microbiome-wide association studies) evaluating brain, serum, and oral samples.

What was found

The presence of oral bacteria in brain tissue was associated with a significant increase in AD risk (OR = 10.68, 95% CI: 4.48–25.43; p < 0.00001, I² = 0%). Detection of *Porphyromonas gingivalis* in the brain specifically was also associated with increased risk (OR = 6.84, 95% CI: 2.70–17.31; p < 0.0001, I² = 0%). Patients with AD showed lower oral microbiota alpha diversity than healthy controls, though specific bacterial community patterns were inconsistent across studies.

Why it matters

This review quantifies the clinical link between oral dysbiosis, brain colonization by oral pathobionts like *P. gingivalis*, and AD, supporting hypotheses that periodontal pathogens may contribute to neurodegenerative pathology.

Limits

The underlying studies are observational (primarily post-mortem or cross-sectional), which cannot establish causality or determine whether bacterial invasion is a cause or consequence of blood-brain barrier breakdown in AD. Total sample size was not reported in the abstract, and community-level microbiome findings were heterogeneous across studies.

Cited by