Hajjar · Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2023 · observational cohort study · n=206

Development of digital voice biomarkers and associations with cognition, cerebrospinal biomarkers, and neural representation in early Alzheimer's disease.

Cited 71 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Observational cohort study assessing diagnostic accuracy and prospective disease progression

PubMed 36777093 · doi:10.1002/dad2.12393 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Connected speech recordings, neuropsychological assessments, neuroimaging, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarker data were collected from 206 participants: 92 cognitively unimpaired (40 amyloid-β positive [Aβ+]) and 114 cognitively impaired (63 Aβ+). Machine learning models were used to extract lexical-semantic and acoustic features from audio recordings to evaluate diagnostic performance for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), biological AD status, and 2-year disease progression.

What was found

Lexical-semantic scores achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 and acoustic scores achieved an AUC of 0.77 for detecting MCI, outperforming the Boston Naming Test (AUC = 0.66). Only lexical-semantic scores differentiated amyloid-β status (p = 0.0003) and correlated with CSF amyloid-β (p = 0.007). Acoustic scores correlated with hippocampal volume (p = 0.017). Both voice biomarker measures were significantly associated with 2-year disease progression.

Why it matters

Automated acoustic and lexical-semantic voice features provide a non-invasive, scalable digital biomarker reflecting molecular and structural pathology in early Alzheimer's disease.

Limits

The sample size is moderate (n = 206) and lacks reported external validation across diverse accents, dialects, and recording conditions. Exact effect sizes, hazard ratios, and numerical risk estimates for 2-year progression were not provided in the abstract.

Cited by