Yang · Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology 2023 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=44 studies (4,606 participants)

Efficacy and safety of berberine for several cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cited 32 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 36805484 · doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154716 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the efficacy and safety of berberine in cardiovascular diseases across ten electronic databases from inception to December 23, 2022. The review included RCTs comparing berberine alone or combined with statins versus statins or routine care according to Cochrane Handbook methods.

What was found

Forty-four RCTs with 4,606 patients were analyzed. Berberine monotherapy showed no significant differences versus routine or statin therapy for total cholesterol (SMD, 0.43; 95% CI, -0.39 to 1.24; p = 0.30; I² = 95%), triglycerides (SMD, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.21; p = 0.44; I² = 76%), LDL-C (SMD, 0.69; 95% CI, -0.23 to 1.60; p = 0.14; I² = 96%), HDL-C (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, -0.48 to 1.57; p = 0.30; I² = 96%), or Crouse score, but significantly reduced NIHSS score, hs-CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, and intima-media thickness (IMT). Berberine plus statins significantly reduced total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, NIHSS score, hs-CRP, TNF-α, IMT, Crouse score, and number of unstable plaques compared to routine or statins alone, with no difference in HDL-C or IL-6. No significant differences in adverse reactions were found between groups.

Why it matters

Berberine combined with statins may offer therapeutic benefit for lipid management, inflammation reduction, and plaque stability in cardiovascular disease without increasing adverse events.

Limits

Statistical heterogeneity among lipid analyses was extremely high (I² from 76% to 96%). The review's findings are limited by the quality of the included original RCTs, and exact effect estimates for non-lipid outcomes were not reported in the abstract.

Cited by