Sharma · Journal of psychoactive drugs 2023 · mixed methods systematic review · n=7 studies (reported in 10 papers)

Psychedelic Treatments for Substance Use Disorder and Substance Misuse: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.

Cited 27 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review of empirical intervention studies

PubMed 36933948 · doi:10.1080/02791072.2023.2190319 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A mixed-methods systematic review searching 11 databases, trial registries, and psychedelic organization websites for English-language empirical studies published between 2000 and 2021. Eligible studies evaluated adults undergoing treatment with psilocybin, ibogaine, or ayahuasca (alone or adjunct to psychotherapy) for substance use disorder (SUD) or subdiagnostic substance misuse.

What was found

Seven studies across 10 papers met inclusion criteria, evaluating diverse addictions including opioid, nicotine, alcohol, cocaine, and unspecified substance misuse. Reported measures of abstinence, substance use, psychological and psychosocial outcomes, craving, and withdrawal indicated positive results; however, the abstract provides no specific numerical values or pooled effect estimates. Qualitative synthesis (from 3 studies) reported subjective improvements in self-awareness, insight, and confidence. The authors concluded there is currently insufficient research evidence to support the effectiveness of any psychedelic for any specific substance disorder.

Why it matters

Despite recent clinical and public interest, this review shows that empirical evidence for psychedelic-assisted substance use treatment remains limited, scarce across specific substance categories, and insufficient to guide standard practice.

Limits

The abstract reports no numerical outcome data, effect sizes, or confidence intervals. Included studies span diverse substances and interventions, and the underlying evidence base is limited by scarce data, lack of large sample sizes, and absent long-term follow-up.

Cited by