Rondón-Avalo · Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry 2024 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=26 studies

Association of Down syndrome with periodontal diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cited 20 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational/case-control studies

PubMed 37341556 · doi:10.1111/scd.12892 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

Two independent reviewers systematically searched six databases up to January 2023 for studies comparing gingivitis or periodontitis in people with Down syndrome versus controls without Down syndrome. Across 26 included studies, the authors conducted meta-analyses, risk of bias assessments, sensitivity analyses, publication bias assessments, and evidence certainty grading.

What was found

- Periodontitis was significantly associated with Down syndrome (OR 3.93; 95% CI: 1.81 to 8.53; 11 studies). - Probing depth was significantly greater in individuals with Down syndrome compared to controls (mean difference 0.40 mm; 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.70 mm). - Gingivitis was significantly associated with Down syndrome (OR 1.93; 95% CI: 1.09 to 3.41; 4 studies). - Included studies also showed qualitative tendencies toward greater plaque accumulation, periodontal attachment loss, and bleeding on probing in Down syndrome. - Overall evidence certainty was graded as moderate.

Why it matters

This review confirms a substantially elevated risk of both gingivitis and periodontitis in individuals with Down syndrome, emphasizing the need for structured, early oral hygiene interventions and frequent periodontal monitoring in this population.

Limits

The underlying evidence base consists of medium- and low-quality observational studies. The abstract does not report total participant counts across the 26 studies, nor does it detail adjustments for key confounders such as age, oral hygiene practices, or institutionalization.

Cited by