Unwin · BMJ nutrition, prevention & health 2023 · retrospective cohort service evaluation · n=186

What predicts drug-free type 2 diabetes remission? Insights from an 8-year general practice service evaluation of a lower carbohydrate diet with weight loss.

Cited 71 times in the scientific literature.

Level 4 - case-series / case-control

Uncontrolled retrospective cohort / clinical service evaluation without a parallel control group.

PubMed 37559961 · doi:10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000544 · record verified 2026-08-28

What was done

Between 2013 and 2021 in a UK general practice of 9,800 patients, adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were routinely offered advice on a lower carbohydrate diet and weight loss delivered via one-to-one GP consultations, group sessions, and phone calls. Patients who opted in (n=186, representing 39% of the practice's T2D register) were tracked in an ongoing audit comparing baseline parameters with their latest follow-up (average duration 33 months).

What was found

Participants achieved a mean weight loss of 10.0 kg (SD 8.9), with median weight dropping from 97 kg (IQR 84–109) to 86 kg (IQR 76–99). Median HbA1c decreased from 63 mmol/mol (IQR 54–80) to 46 mmol/mol (IQR 42–53). Overall, 51% of the cohort achieved drug-free remission (77% among those with T2D duration <1 year, declining to 20% in those with duration >15 years). Mean LDL cholesterol fell by 0.5 mmol/L, triglycerides fell by 0.9 mmol/L, and systolic blood pressure fell by 12 mmHg. The practice spent £4.94 per patient/year on diabetes drugs compared to a local average of £11.30.

Why it matters

This evaluation demonstrates that routine low-carbohydrate dietary advice integrated into standard primary care can induce durable diabetes remission in highly motivated patients, particularly when initiated within the first year of diagnosis.

Limits

The study was an uncontrolled service evaluation relying on self-selected participants (39% of eligible patients), introducing substantial self-selection and motivation bias. There was no randomized or parallel control group to account for confounding or secular trends, dietary adherence was not objectively quantified, and data reflect a single suburban GP practice.

Cited by