Zhao · The Journal of nutrition 2023 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=20 studies (1,761 participants)

Overall and Sex-Specific Effect of Berberine on Glycemic and Insulin-Related Traits: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Cited 13 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 37598753 · doi:10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.08.016 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

Authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42022345172) of randomized placebo-controlled trials of berberine identified through Medline, Embase, CNKI, registries, and prior reviews. Random-effects inverse-variance weighting was used to calculate mean differences for glycemic and insulin traits. Subgroup analyses were conducted across sex, diabetes status, trial duration, berberine dosage, and ethnicity across 20 included trials (n = 1,761).

What was found

Berberine significantly reduced: - Fasting glucose: -0.52 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.72 to -0.33; 18 studies, n = 1,522) - HbA1c: -4.48 mmol/mol (95% CI: -6.53 to -2.44; 7 studies, n = 756) - Fasting insulin: -2.36 mU/L (95% CI: -3.64 to -1.08; 11 studies, n = 966) - HOMA-IR: -0.85 (95% CI: -1.16 to -0.53; 12 studies, n = 1,065) - 2-hour postprandial glucose: -1.81 mmol/L (95% CI: -2.37 to -1.24; 4 studies, n = 501) Comparing 4 trials conducted exclusively in women to 1 trial in men, women showed greater reductions in fasting glucose (mean difference -0.21 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.00) and HOMA-IR (mean difference -0.97, 95% CI -1.84 to -0.10). Greater fasting glucose reductions were also reported for individuals with diabetes and Asian populations.

Why it matters

This review quantifies the modest glycemic and insulin-sensitizing benefits of berberine supplementation and highlights potential heterogeneity in response across biological sex, baseline metabolic status, and ethnicity.

Limits

The sex-disaggregated analysis is severely constrained by data availability, relying on only 4 female-only trials and a single male-only trial. The abstract reports no safety or adverse-event outcomes, average study sample sizes were modest (under 100 participants per trial on average), and long-term durability of effect beyond standard trial durations was not characterized.

Cited by