Khera · The journal of sexual medicine 2023 · systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=11 studies

Effect of aerobic exercise on erectile function: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cited 33 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 37814532 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdad130 · record verified 2026-08-27

What was done

A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to evaluate the effect of aerobic exercise versus non-exercising controls on erectile function. Outcomes were measured using the International Index of Erectile Function Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF, scored 6 to 30). Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the association of moderator variables on the meta-analysis results.

What was found

Across 11 randomized controlled trials, aerobic exercise significantly improved IIEF-EF scores compared with controls, with a mean difference of 2.8 points (95% CI, 1.7-3.9; P < .001) and moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 53%). Greater improvements were observed in men with lower baseline scores: 2.3, 3.3, and 4.9 points for mild, moderate, and severe erectile dysfunction, respectively (P = .02). Meta-analysis results were not influenced by publication bias or individual study effects.

Why it matters

This meta-analysis provides Level 1 evidence supporting regular aerobic exercise as a low-risk, nonpharmacological intervention for erectile dysfunction, especially for men with more severe baseline impairment.

Limits

The total number of individual participants was not reported in the abstract. Moderate heterogeneity was present across trials (I2 = 53%), and the included studies evaluated diverse clinical groups, which may complicate interpretation for specific patient subgroups. Specific exercise modalities, durations, and intensities were not detailed in the abstract.

Cited by