Torosis · Obstetrics and gynecology 2024 · Delphi consensus study · n=11

A Treatment Algorithm for High-Tone Pelvic Floor Dysfunction.

Cited 39 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Delphi consensus panel based on expert opinion

PubMed 38387036 · doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005536 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A three-round anonymous web-based Delphi study was conducted between September and December 2021 with 11 invited national experts in urology, urogynecology, minimally invasive gynecology, and pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT). Panelists evaluated evidence-based statements across iterative survey rounds to reach consensus on a clinical treatment algorithm for high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction (HTPFD).

What was found

In round one, 10 of 31 statements reached consensus; in round two, 17 of 28 reposed statements reached consensus; in round three, the proposed algorithm reached clinical consensus. The panel reached universal agreement designating PFPT as first-line treatment. If PFPT is successful, patients transition to a home exercise program. For non-responders, second-line therapies comprise trigger or tender point injections, vaginal muscle relaxants, and cognitive behavioral therapy (adjunctively or sequentially). OnabotulinumtoxinA injections are third-line with symptom evaluation at 2–4 weeks, and sacral neuromodulation reached universal agreement as fourth-line treatment. For patients facing PFPT access barriers, guided pelvic floor relaxation, self-massage with vaginal wands, and virtual PFPT visits are recommended.

Why it matters

HTPFD affects an estimated 80% of women with chronic pelvic pain but has lacked standardized clinical pathways. This algorithm provides a multidisciplinary, stepwise framework spanning conservative therapy to invasive interventions.

Limits

The recommendations reflect expert consensus rather than direct prospective clinical outcome data. The panel was small (11 experts) and recruited by targeted invitation. Consensus thresholds and quantitative agreement percentages are not reported in the abstract.

Cited by