Wahbeh · Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 2024 · scoping review · n=67 studies

Impact of tobacco smoking on disease-specific outcomes in common neurological disorders: A scoping review.

Cited 15 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Scoping review synthesizing heterogeneous observational literature without formal meta-analysis

PubMed 38428126 · doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2024.02.013 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This scoping review synthesized findings from 67 studies evaluating the impact of tobacco smoking and smoking cessation on disease-specific clinical outcomes across seven common neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis, stroke/transient ischemic attack, cognitive impairment/dementia, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and cluster headache.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical estimates or effect sizes. Qualitatively, smoking was associated with greater clinical and radiological progression, relapses, cognitive decline, mood symptoms, and disease-related mortality in multiple sclerosis; increased stroke recurrence, post-stroke cardiovascular events, mortality, and cognitive/functional impairment in stroke and transient ischemic attack; faster cognitive decline in dementia and Parkinson's disease (without motor symptom worsening in Parkinson's); higher mortality in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; and longer, more frequent attack periods in cluster headache. Smoking cessation was associated with improved outcomes in multiple sclerosis and stroke.

Why it matters

While smoking is an established risk factor for incident neurological disease, this review synthesizes evidence showing it also worsens secondary outcomes and disease progression across several established conditions. Smoking cessation interventions could potentially mitigate adverse trajectories in neurological patients.

Limits

The abstract provides no numerical data, effect estimates, or confidence intervals. The underlying evidence is observational, subject to confounding and variable exposure/outcome definitions, and scoping review methodology does not assess risk of bias or conduct quantitative meta-analysis.

Cited by