McDermott · JAMA surgery 2024 · narrative review · n=?

Management of Gallstone Pancreatitis: A Review.

Cited 41 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review without systematic review methodology

PubMed 38691369 · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.8111 · record verified 2026-08-29

What was done

Narrative review synthesizing clinical evidence and guideline recommendations for the management of gallstone pancreatitis, covering severity assessment, fluid resuscitation, cholecystectomy timing, indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and common bile duct evaluation.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical findings or effect sizes. Key narrative conclusions include: goal-directed moderate fluid resuscitation reduces mortality and fluid overload risks compared with aggressive resuscitation; mild disease warrants same-admission cholecystectomy within 48 hours; severe disease requires delayed cholecystectomy (optimal timing remains unclear); preoperative ERCP is reserved for suspected cholangitis or biliary obstruction; and intraoperative cholangiography is associated with reduced length of stay and fewer ERCPs.

Why it matters

Clarifies evidence-based best practices for mild gallstone pancreatitis while highlighting ongoing diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties in moderately severe and severe presentations.

Limits

As a narrative review, it lacks systematic search criteria, meta-analytic pooling, and risk-of-bias grading. The abstract provides no quantitative data. High-level evidence to guide treatment of moderately severe and severe disease remains limited.

Cited by