Kim · International journal of molecular sciences 2024 · Phytochemical profiling study · n=134 plant accessions

Variations of Major Glucosinolates in Diverse Chinese Cabbage ( Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) Germplasm as Analyzed by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.

Cited 10 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Level 5 by design analogy (laboratory-based plant phytochemical profiling with no human subjects)

PubMed 38732049 · doi:10.3390/ijms25094829 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

The authors profiled 20 glucosinolates in the leaf lamina of 134 Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis) germplasm accessions using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS). Principal component analysis (PCA), variable importance in projection (VIP) scores, and correlation analyses were applied to assess metabolic variation across accessions.

What was found

Glucobrassicanapin and gluconapin were the predominant compounds identified, each exhibiting mean concentration levels above 1000.00 μmol/kg dry weight (DW). PCA separated seven accessions (IT186728, IT120044, IT221789, IT100417, IT278620, IT221754, and IT344740) that contained higher total glucosinolates. Thirteen compounds drove germplasm variation based on VIP values. Total glucosinolate content correlated positively (p < 0.001) with gluconapin (r = 0.78), progoitrin (r = 0.74), sinigrin (r = 0.73), epiprogoitrin (r = 0.73), glucobrassicanapin (r = 0.70), and gluconasturtiin (r = 0.67).

Why it matters

This profiling quantifies natural chemical diversity in Chinese cabbage germplasm, highlighting high-yield accessions and dominant individual compounds to inform selective crop breeding for nutrition or consumer preferences.

Limits

The study is limited to laboratory analytical profiling of leaf lamina across 134 accessions without assessing environmental growing conditions, post-harvest stability, culinary processing effects, or human bioavailability. Specific total glucosinolate values and variance ranges were not reported in the abstract.

Cited by