Dreyzin · Expert review of clinical immunology 2024 · narrative review · n=?

Overcoming the challenges of primary resistance and relapse after CAR-T cell therapy.

Cited 13 times in the scientific literature.

Level 5 - mechanism / opinion, no new human data

Narrative review synthesizing mechanisms of resistance and developmental strategies without systematic review methodology or primary data.

PubMed 38739466 · doi:10.1080/1744666X.2024.2349738 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

This narrative review synthesized current evidence on the mechanisms underlying primary resistance and post-response relapse following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in hematologic malignancies, as well as emerging technological and clinical strategies designed to overcome treatment failure.

What was found

The authors report that only approximately 50% of patients with relapsed B-cell hematologic malignancies achieve complete, sustained responses. Primary resistance is attributed to manufacturing failures, suboptimal baseline fitness of autologous T-cells, and intrinsic tumor or microenvironmental factors. Relapse is categorized into antigen-positive failure (driven by CAR T-cell exhaustion or limited persistence) and antigen-negative failure (driven by target antigen modulation). No additional quantitative metrics were provided in the abstract.

Why it matters

Understanding the distinct biological pathways leading to CAR-T failure is critical for designing next-generation cell constructs, optimized pre-conditioning regimens, and rational combination immunotherapies to achieve durable remissions.

Limits

The paper is a non-systematic narrative review providing broad expert commentary without formal meta-analytic pooling, systematic search criteria, or primary clinical trial data.

Cited by