Nemkov · Cell metabolism 2024 · observational cohort and genetic association study · n=13,029 blood donors, 643 RBC units (1,929 samples), 525 mice, and 5,816 critically ill transfusion recipients

Biological and genetic determinants of glycolysis: Phosphofructokinase isoforms boost energy status of stored red blood cells and transfusion outcomes.

Cited 44 times in the scientific literature.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Multi-cohort observational genetic and metabolomic association study linked with patient transfusion outcomes

PubMed 38964323 · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2024.06.007 · record verified 2026-08-30

What was done

Researchers analyzed end-of-storage red blood cell (RBC) glycolytic metabolites in 13,029 blood donors from the Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study (REDS) to identify associations with donor age, sex, and ancestry-specific genetic polymorphisms in regions encoding *PFKP*, *HK1*, and *CD38*/*BST1*. Findings were validated in fresh and stored RBCs from 525 Diversity Outbred mice and through multi-omics profiling of 1,929 samples from 643 human RBC storage units. Associations between RBC ATP and hypoxanthine levels (and their linked genetic traits) and hemolysis were examined in vitro and in vivo among healthy autologous recipients and 5,816 critically ill heterologous transfusion recipients.

What was found

Donor genetic variants in *PFKP*, *HK1*, and *CD38*/*BST1* were associated with end-of-storage glycolytic metabolite levels. ATP and hypoxanthine levels, together with their underlying genetic traits, were associated with in vitro hemolysis as well as in vivo hemolysis in both healthy autologous transfusion recipients and critically ill patients. The abstract reported no specific numerical values, effect sizes, or p-values.

Why it matters

This study links donor genetic variations controlling RBC energy status during storage directly to transfusion-induced hemolysis, highlighting potential biological markers to optimize donor selection and improve transfusion outcomes.

Limits

The abstract does not provide numerical effect sizes, relative risks, or confidence intervals. The human clinical components are observational cohorts subject to residual confounding, and the abstract does not report whether genotype-guided donor unit matching prospectively improves clinical endpoints.

Cited by