Zhang · Critical reviews in food science and nutrition 2025 · systematic review and meta-analysis · n=12 studies (513 participants)

Efficacy of oral nicotinamide mononucleotide supplementation on glucose and lipid metabolism for adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials.

Cited 5 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 39116016 · doi:10.1080/10408398.2024.2387324 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science) to assess the effects of oral NMN supplementation on fasting glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, and blood NAD levels in adults. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using the RoB 2 tool.

What was found

Across 12 studies encompassing 513 participants, random-effects meta-analyses showed an overall significant effect of NMN supplementation in elevating blood NAD levels. However, most clinically relevant metabolic outcomes showed no statistically significant differences between the NMN and control groups. The abstract reports no numerical effect sizes, p-values, or confidence intervals.

Why it matters

Despite widespread interest in NMN supplementation for metabolic enhancement, current trial evidence does not support meaningful improvements in glycemic or lipid profiles, indicating that claimed metabolic benefits may be exaggerated.

Limits

The abstract provides no point estimates, effect sizes, or confidence intervals. Methodological quality across the primary studies was poor, with 7 trials showing some concerns and 5 trials showing high risk of bias. The total evidence base is small, comprising only 513 participants across 12 trials.

Cited by