Zakerinasab · Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2024 · Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=18 studies (1870 participants)

The effects of growth hormone supplementation in poor ovarian responders undergoing In vitro fertilization or Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Cited 0 times in the scientific literature.

Level 1 - systematic review of randomized trials

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PubMed 39228251 · doi:10.4274/tjod.galenos.2024.59944 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials comprising 1,870 poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Outcomes assessed included live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, cycle cancelation rate, retrieved oocyte count, transferred embryo count, total gonadotropin dose, treatment duration, and peak estradiol level. Meta-regression evaluated potential linear relationships between stimulation outcomes and assisted reproduction success.

What was found

Growth hormone supplementation significantly increased retrieved oocyte count (SMD 0.65, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.00), transferred embryos (SMD 0.80, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.21), and peak estradiol level (SMD 1.20, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.81). It significantly decreased total gonadotropin dose (SMD -0.82, 95% CI -1.25 to -0.39) and gonadotropin duration (SMD -0.63, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.22). Meta-regression found no linear relationship between clinical pregnancy, live birth rate, or cycle cancelation rate and the measured stimulation outcomes (p > 0.1). Pooled effect sizes and numbers for live birth and clinical pregnancy rates were not reported in the abstract.

Why it matters

Adjuvant growth hormone improves surrogate markers of ovarian response and reduces gonadotropin requirements in poor ovarian responders undergoing assisted reproduction.

Limits

The abstract does not provide pooled effect sizes or statistical findings for key clinical endpoints such as live birth rate or clinical pregnancy rate. Variations in growth hormone dosing protocols, patient response criteria, and cost-effectiveness considerations were not described.

Cited by